Implementation & ROI
Current ROI Reality
MSPs across Reddit and vendor reports note measurable benefits:
Resolution Speed: 30–60% faster overall, up to 60% faster for P1 tickets
Productivity: 15–30% more tickets per tech (≈ 2 FTEs saved)
Escalation Reduction: 80–86% fewer L2 handoffs
Alert Management: 80–90% fewer false positives (example: ConnectWise RMM)
(Source citations still needed — mix of vendor claims + MSP peer reports.)
Common Implementation Mistakes
Most AI rollout failures come not from the tools, but from how they’re deployed. Avoiding common mistakes prevents wasted spend and broken processes.
Strategic Errors
Expecting AI to solve non-existent processes e.g., deploying AI triage when categories are inconsistent = garbage in, garbage out
Lack of measurable objectives or success criteria e.g., rolling out summaries without tracking resolution time or escalation rates
Choosing generic tools without MSP context e.g., using ChatGPT for ticket notes instead of a PSA-integrated assistant
Technical Errors
Insufficient data quality before AI implementation e.g., alert fatigue from noisy monitoring data means AI just replicates noise faster
Poor integration causing duplicate data entry e.g., AI summaries don’t sync both ways, forcing manual copy-paste
Missing human verification workflows e.g., allowing AI scripts to run without engineer review → confidently wrong fixes
Evaluation Framework
Ask before enabling any AI feature:
Data boundaries: Does the DPA explicitly state no training on client data?
Integration depth: Is it PSA/RMM-native or just API glue?
Cost model: Per-tech, usage-based, or bundled?
Auditability: Is AI decision-making logged for review?
Checklist
Bottom Line
AI won’t fix broken workflows. Success comes from clean processes, clear metrics, and disciplined human verification. The biggest ROI gains come when MSPs treat AI as an augmentation layer, not a replacement for process.
Last updated
Was this helpful?